Фото: AjayTvm / Shutterstock / Fotodom
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
，更多细节参见Line官方版本下载
a vacuum fluorescent display and choice of "numeric" (accounting, similar to a
63-летняя Деми Мур вышла в свет с неожиданной стрижкой17:54
世超研究了一下发现，绿联的发家史简直是活生生的商业爽文，运气十分邪门，每次都成功赌中风口，所以，今天再来跟大家聊聊。